Is it by mistake or design?

25 Jan

I love Lana Del Rey, but her performance on Saturday Night Live earlier this month was godawful. Let’s get that out of the way first. I’m not surprised by how negatively people reacted to her TV debut, because it was bad. Bad! No need to qualify it. And no need to defend her either—she choked.

But I’m interested in the more general rejection of Lana Del Rey, the accusation that she’s somehow “too manufactured.” I won’t contest that—Lana Del Rey is no more authentic than any other pop star, indie or otherwise. She’s a calculated assemblage of attractive traits designed to lure us in: her persona is just as important (if not more so) than her voice. And Lana Del Rey isn’t doing this because music is her passion (she’s said otherwise) or to save the lives of bullied gay teens (however noble a cause that is). She’s doing it because she can, and she’s upfront about it.

Why does that get under our skin? Is the admission of fakeness worse than the fakeness itself? While most would be loath to admit it, I’d say the answer is yes. We don’t want to see the man behind the curtain—or in this case, the forced hipster buzz propelling Lana Del Rey to insta-fame. We don’t want to distinguish the performance from reality, and artists like Lady Gaga pander to that. It’s an open secret that however weird she may have been growing up, Stefani Germanotta did not wake up one morning dressed in meat. As a rallying cry for queer youth, “Born This Way” works, but let’s not pretend Gaga’s behavior isn’t an affectation.

I love Lady Gaga, too, and so far she’s shown more promise than Lana Del Rey. (At the very least, she’s a lot more prolific!) Still, I roll my eyes at her assertion that yes, she would dress the way she dresses even if she weren’t Gaga. I’m not questioning her authenticity: I’m questioning why authenticity is even an issue. By now, we’ve been exposed to shows like American Idol—we’ve seen exactly what goes in to the creation of a pop star. This is the way it’s always been, but now it’s more obvious than ever before. So when Elizabeth Grant plumps her lips, bats her eyelashes, and becomes Lana Del Rey, why do we care?

Even growing up with ‘N Sync’s No Strings Attached, we knew there was a puppeteer, right? Sure, there’s a difference between bubblegum boy band pop and Lana Del Rey’s “indie” aesthetic. But both are different products created to appeal to contemporary sensibilities. For me, part of Lana Del Rey’s likability is her self-awareness. There’s talent there, yes, but she’s not “real.” That works for me, because I know that no one is named Lana Del Rey, and that no one is born looking like that. If she tried to convince me otherwise, I’d appreciate the effort but I’d sneer just the same.

When people rail against Lana Del Rey, I’d guess their anger has more to do with the fact that what she’s doing is working. She went on SNL and gave what some would call a career-destroying performance (I wouldn’t go that far, but I grimaced the whole way through)—and she’s more successful than ever before. In the wake of that televised debacle, she has given a few cringe-worthy interviews. Talking to FUSE, she put it plainly: “You can’t expect too much from my show.”

But here’s the real kicker: I don’t buy that either. That “honesty,” the disaffected response to the haters, is as fabricated as Lana Del Rey herself. It’s all part of the creation, a weirdly meta character who is somehow in on the joke and above it at the same time. When a performer admits, “I think, like, the people who have been listening to my music for a little while know that I’m more of a writer and, like, a studio singer,” she is daring you to like her. (Like, seriously.) Can you hear shit like that and still get behind Lana Del Rey?

Of course. I don’t care, and neither should you. Because while Elizabeth Grant might give a shit, Lana Del Rey doesn’t. When we attack an artist for being fake, we’re attacking her for exposing the artifice, which is silly. If Lady Gaga can capitalize on our naïve perception of individuality, why shouldn’t Lana Del Rey be able to make a career out of subverting it? Perhaps it reflects poorly on us: she flubs, she shrugs, she rises to new heights of fame. But that’s on us. We can no more criticize her than we can a Kardashian: Lana Del Rey has fashioned herself into exactly what we need her to be.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “Is it by mistake or design?”

  1. tim January 25, 2012 at 3:59 pm #

    “There is perhaps no phenomenon which contains so much destructive feeling as moral indignation, which permits envy or to be acted out under the guise of virtue.”
    Erich Fromm

  2. Neil January 25, 2012 at 6:55 pm #

    Welcome back!

    • Brittani January 25, 2012 at 8:57 pm #

      This is an interesting comparison, because while Lady Gaga is following a Fame Formula just as Del Rey is, Gaga’s seems more authentic in its brazenness. We’re aware that she is controlling her perception of us, whereas, I think Del Rey knows that she has either lost control of our perception or never really had it and she’s self-aware enough to acknowledge the fact that she’s not really pulling it off. Taking on an entirely new persona must be tremendously difficult, especially since Del Rey was Lizzie, what, just 3 years ago? Also, the White Girl Wearing Gold Hoops And Using The Word Gangsta schtick takes a level of confidence (See: the video for Judas) that Del Rey doesn’t even seem to have buried somewhere inside of her. I even think the allowance of the word “meta” for her is too generous. I think she is a talented singer whose mere talent wasn’t cutting it so she’s sheepishly giving something else a shot, but she’s too afraid to commit to it lest it fail, as well. She’s overly removed from her craft, while Gaga is immersed in it. I think that’s the distinction that people are picking up on. That said, I think Lana’s musical style is interesting and unique and beautiful and nothing about what she does irks me in the way that so many people seem to be irked.

  3. brummiegitpressLuke James February 8, 2012 at 4:09 pm #

    It’s sad that we’ve lost the illusion of pop stars as heroes, as idols. Now we’re all too painfully aware of their “Made In” stickers. I was lucky enough to grow up thinking David Bowie was soem sort of musical god and then go out and create my own smaller version of the illusion. It feels good when it worlks, when it works from the stage and from teh audience it’s intoxicating!

  4. Mandi March 25, 2012 at 8:34 pm #

    I might be the only person in the world that doesn’t think it was bad. It wasn’t a flashy performance and she did kinda move weird, but she sang on pitch and “Video Games” is a lovely song.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: